Religious freedom has become a hot button topic in politics in recent years, particularly in instances like the Little Sisters of the Poor Supreme Court case, Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the backlash that ensued from it, and bathroom policies at Target stores nationwide. The latter two "religious freedom issues" mentioned have been talked about ad nauseam in the media and in Facebook posts, but it is easy to forget in the controversy that America was founded on the very concept of religious freedom. From the Puritans of Massachusetts to the Catholics of Maryland, many of the original thirteen colonies were formed by religious groups fleeing persecution in their home countries and seeking a new start in a new land. To this day, immigrants still come to America in order to practice their religion freely, a right that is protected by the First Amendment to the US Constitution.
The Catholic Church also advocates for religious freedom in Vatican II document Gaudium et Spes. The council argues that "the right to express one's own opinion and to profess one's religion both publicly and privately" (73) is one that should be protected by governments. The council urges respect not only for the Christian religion, but for other religious opinions as well, and denounces governments and political systems that oppress religion and "hamper civic or religious freedom, victimize large numbers through avarice and political crimes, and divert the exercise of authority from the service of the common good to the interests of one or another faction or of the rulers themselves" (73). In the opinion of the council fathers who wrote Gauidum et Spes and the Catholic Church as a whole, religious freedom should come from a place of tolerance and compassion and from respect for the common good. "There is no better way to establish political life," the council explains, "on a truly human basis than by fostering an inward sense of justice and kindliness, and of service to the common good" (73).
Recently in America, there has been what seems to be a trend away from the idea of "freedom of religion" to "freedom from religion." Meaning, instead of primarily protecting the right to express and practice religion, American politics has become more focused on protecting the right to not have religion forced upon anyone. This has begun to spiral to a point where many simple expressions of religion are considered attacks on those who do not follow the particular religion being expressed. A perfect example will be thrown back into the public eye as the holiday season approaches. The greeting "Merry Christmas" is considered by some non-Christians to be offensive, and this debate has manifested itself in many forms over the past few years in many different ways, like last year's Starbucks cup debate. I believe that our country could benefits from Gaudium et Spes' approach and view individual expressions of religion with tolerance, respect, and love, rather than as an attack, especially in this holiday season after a particularly divisive election.





